Despite promising declines in global hunger over the past decades, the number of people experiencing food insecurity has been rising since 2015. This increase has been primarily fuelled by the rise in internal or international conflicts, which were found to be the main driver of food insecurity in 21 countries in 2018. This explains why contributing to the prospects for peace is essential to fight hunger in many parts of the world.
WFP is exploring ways to ensure that its food assistance programmes support countries and communities in transitioning to peace and do not exacerbate existing tensions.
Globally, it is estimated that up to 80 percent of humanitarian needs arise – in part – from violent conflict. As the world’s largest humanitarian organization, WFP is on the frontline to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on ending hunger by 2030 and is a major contributor to SDG 16, which aims to build peaceful, just and inclusive societies. Food security and conflict are closely linked. The 2013 policy “WFP’s Role in Peacebuilding in Transition Settings” outlines principles and programming approaches for supporting wider United Nations efforts to help countries restore peace.
In 2018, WFP established a multi-year knowledge partnership with the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) to build the evidence base on how its programming contributes to peace prospects, apply the research findings to programming, and revise the peacebuilding policy, if required.
international policy and legal framework
for addressing conflict-related food insecurity (UNSC Res 2417) was passed in 2018
countries
where WFP’s role in contributing to peace prospects was examined by WFP/SIPRI research teams
programme areas
were identified in which WFP’s activities were found to help prevent conflict or contribute to the foundations for peace
The initial phase of SIPRI’s research found that WFP’s activities that invest in livelihoods through Food Assistance for Assets (FFA) or Food Assistance for Training (FFT), build strong linkages between states and their citizens, use community-based participatory planning and promote natural resource management helped prevent conflict or contribute to the foundations for peace. A fifth area that was identified for further research is how general food assistance (GFA) and stabilization affects peacebuilding objectives.
For example, SIPRI observed that two WFP projects in El Salvador targeting urban youth in marginalized, gang-controlled areas of the capital demonstrably contributed to improving the prospects for peace at the local level. In Kyrgyzstan, SIPRI confirmed that the increase in water supplies and agricultural productivity resulting from FFA activities helped to prevent inter-community conflict over water.
million people
in 55 countries benefited from FFA and FFT activities in 2018
reduction in the number of clashes between individuals in Kyrgyzstan
households
received training to become ‘peers for peace’ in conflict-affected villages in Mali
Interested in learning more about WFP’s results in this thematic area?
Please feel free to reach out to us for briefings, presentations or additional reading resources and to be subscribed to receive next year’s Beyond the Annual Performance Report series.